Teams

Supreme Court

2022 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-21vs String CourtettesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesShelley Terry / Barbara Seligman vs Holly Glauser / Judith MacKay3-6, 3-4
W#2 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-14vs Sassy SmashersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Indre Conners6-3, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Biderman / Shelley Terry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Yetzenia Correa Kianez3-6, 2-3
2022-06-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Ashley Vroman-Lee6-0, 5-5
2022-05-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-16vs Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#1 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Indre Conners6-4, 0-2
2022-04-23vs Spin DoctorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelley Terry / Elizabeth Talotta vs Tiffany Malloy / Cynthia Grubbs6-2, 4-3
2022-04-19vs Slice GirlsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesShelley Terry / Mary Frances Daly vs Charmaine Wynter Carpenter / Kylie Gaskins1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Laura Mattis6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Pamela Gelfond
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.94
Sara Franklin
published
2.87
Stephanie Fultz
published
Shelley Terry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Parris
published 3
2.66
Hilary Dixon
published 3
2.53
Kathy Potter
published
Krupaa Lakshmi
published
Shelly Briscoe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pamela Gelfond
81W–119L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Sara Franklin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Stephanie Fultz
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Shelley Terry
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Charlotte Parris
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Hilary Dixon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kathy Potter
15W–45L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Krupaa Lakshmi
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Briscoe
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.