Teams

C3 Raintree Stahling

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs C4 Southampton BrownLost 01
L#2 SinglesShannon Webb vs Deena Kretzer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-22vs C2 MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Webb / Mona Stahling vs Susan Greenspoon / Lisa Loudermilk3-6, 2-6
2021-05-15vs C7 Hermitage HallWon 10
W#2 DoublesBridget Westhoven / Carolyn Moncure vs Virginia Berents / Heidi Hall7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs C5 Dominion HarperWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Corrine Cooper vs Lisa Drucker / Sharon Moorefield6-2, 6-2
2021-04-25vs C1 ACAC StephensLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Barbara Portanova vs Yasmin Lutterbie / Jean Davis2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-17vs C6 Woodlake DeckWon 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Webb / Mona Stahling vs Karen ODonnell / Tami Chalker6-2, 6-2
2021-04-03vs C5 Dominion HarperWon 10
W#3 DoublesDianne Sloane / Carolyn Moncure vs Becky Harper / Elaine McCormick3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Carolyn Moncure
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Suzanne Martin
published
Brenda Tyson
published 3.5
3.23
Corrine Cooper
published 3.5
3.22
Bridget Westhoven
published 3.5
3.10
Shannon Webb
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
Karen Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Webb + Carolyn Moncure033 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Webb + Suzanne Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Suzanne Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brenda Tyson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Corrine Cooper
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Bridget Westhoven
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 8 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.03
Karen Wood
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.