Teams

Pulley/Nashville

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-11vs Jones/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Beth Molteni vs Jeanne Moran-Jones / Joann Covington4-6, 4-6
2026-06-26vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesNadine DuFour / Patti Barrett Wright vs Annette Crocker / Linda Rizor7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdith Nau / Jeannie Tapley vs Anita Clark / Janet Rowland7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudy Hoppe / Joni Beebe vs Mary Ball / Cindy Cunningham7-5, 6-2
2026-06-21vs Bailey/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeanne Ludington / Jeannie Tapley vs Annette Crocker / Linda Rizor3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJenny Barnes / Karen Vasil vs Anita Clark / Mary Ball2-6, 5-7
2026-06-06vs Baker/Bright/NashvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Beth Molteni vs Kim Bright / Lisa Beasley7-6, 6-3
2026-06-05vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeannie Tapley / Jeanne Ludington vs Nancy Bailey / Janet Rowland1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJenny Barnes / Patricia Evans vs Linda Rizor / Annette Crocker0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJanet McMeen / Robin Buchanan vs Mary Smith / Anita Clark7-5, 6-4
2026-05-23vs Jones/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Beth Molteni vs Jamie Tilley / Nita Hollis1-6, 2-6
2026-05-22vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Joni Beebe vs Annette Crocker / Linda Rizor2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanet McMeen / Nadine DuFour vs Anita Clark / Janet Rowland6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdith Nau / Patti Barrett Wright vs MARY SANDERS / Mary Smith6-0, 6-2
2026-05-17vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeanne Ludington / Janet McMeen vs Mary Smith / Mary Ball6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobin Buchanan / Patricia Evans vs Cindy Cunningham / MARY SANDERS6-3, 4-4
W#3 DoublesJenny Barnes / Karen Vasil vs Anita Clark / Janet Rowland4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-16vs Jones/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoni Beebe / Stephanie Dunkle vs Constance Baker / Betty Tudor3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Jeannie Tapley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Jeanne Ludington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Veronica Pulley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Janet McMeen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Patti Barrett Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Karen Vasil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Patricia Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Joni Beebe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Robin Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Edith Nau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Jenny Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Judy Hoppe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nadine DuFour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Tapley + Jeanne Ludington5351% games+0.6% vs expected
Patricia Evans + Karen Vasil0535% gamesnot enough data
Robin Buchanan + Janet McMeen314 matchesnot enough data
Janet McMeen + Karen Vasil134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannie Tapley
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Jeanne Ludington
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Veronica Pulley
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
Janet McMeen
17W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Patti Barrett Wright
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Karen Vasil
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Patricia Evans
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Joni Beebe
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Robin Buchanan
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Edith Nau
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jenny Barnes
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Judy Hoppe
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.41
Nadine DuFour
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.