Teams

WW-Conner

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-27vs CCV-AveryWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / John Baker vs Scott Harrison / Kirsti Goodwin6-3, 6-1
2022-03-06vs ACAC-FieldsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / Joseph Jones vs Elham Tavassoli / John Delisio6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-27vs ACAC-CraneWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Baker / Joseph Jones vs Anne Townsend / Jason Ruth6-4, 4-2
2022-02-12vs HERM-HardestyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / John Baker vs Teki Hall / Dennis Dodson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-08vs WO-BlackwoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / John Baker vs Ingrid Hale / Stephen Mathews6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Matthew Boys
published
3.77
Jacob Dyer
published 4
3.71
Katy Holder
published
3.69
Michelle Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Sean DiBlasi
published
3.36
James Mullahy
published 3.5
3.29
Heather Harker
published 3.5
Christopher Hester
published 3.5
3.17
Jessica van Tuyle
published
3.16
Rose Yuen
published
3.16
Robert Teele
published
3.13
Meredith Schwartz
published
3.09
Meredith Berger
published
3.08
Joseph Jones
published
3.04
Lonnie Lemco
published
Shirley Watkins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Boys
24W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Jacob Dyer
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Katy Holder
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Michelle Baker
150W–84L career · 8 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Sean DiBlasi
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
James Mullahy
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Heather Harker
5W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Hester
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jessica van Tuyle
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Rose Yuen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Robert Teele
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
Meredith Schwartz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Meredith Berger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Joseph Jones
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Lonnie Lemco
13W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Shirley Watkins
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.