Teams

LA - Shadow's Aces

2022 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.61 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule17 played
2022-12-18vs LA - Queen AnneLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Francisco / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs AJ Pruett / Megan Abrigo6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-12-17vs LA-LLW-Queen Anne-Gloria GellerLost 01
L#2 DoublesIndia Mandelkern / Emma Gardner vs Mary Chau / Lisa Licht6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-12-17vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmma Gardner / India Mandelkern vs Sophia Mallaro / Stephanie Salomon5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaleigh Malloy / VICKY TRINH vs Sylvia DSouza / Melissa Fonteboa6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-12-10vs LA - Kiss My AceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesVICKY TRINH / Shirley Fong vs Rita Benson / Erin Fiorito6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesIndia Mandelkern / Celeste Nameth vs Sona Arutyunyan / Rori Sachs1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-20vs LA - Primetime DivasLost 01
L#3 DoublesVICKY TRINH / Darrel Schreiner vs Latonya Bautista / Shante Pearson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-11-19vs LA - Victorious SecretLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Patricia Francisco vs Rae Bochco / Linda Tyrer7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-11-13vs LA - Over ServedWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachael Sonntag-Bloom / Ali Laventhol vs Ali Andre / Kate Jensen6-1, 6-3
2022-11-13vs LA - T-BirdsLost 01
L#3 DoublesDarrel Schreiner / VICKY TRINH vs Alexandra Pichugina / Liz Iacuzzi2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-11-06vs LA - R0YAL FLUSHLost 01
L#1 DoublesVICKY TRINH / Shirley Fong vs Dimple Thakkar / Loretta Peng5-7, 1-6
2022-10-23vs LA - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Rachel Berk vs Kelly Durbin / Kinsey Ball6-4, 6-1
2022-10-22vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#3 DoublesShirley Fong / VICKY TRINH vs Lara Fermanis / Joanna Morley6-2, 6-4
2022-10-16vs LA - NETwork StarsWon 10
W#3 DoublesShirley Fong / VICKY TRINH vs Fredia Waters / Yvonne Branch6-0, 7-5
2022-10-09vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Quan / Ali Laventhol vs Fariba Navid / Marion Bright6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-08vs LA - Racquet ScientistsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAli Laventhol / Chia Chi Tsai vs Joanna Ku / AB Young3-6, 5-7
2022-10-02vs LA-LLW-LATC-Milinda McNeelyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmma Gardner / India Mandelkern vs Kate Angelo / Mylene Moreno7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-02vs LA - Serves You Right!Lost 01
L#2 DoublesIndia Mandelkern / Ali Laventhol vs Tami Reyes / Margaret Gray0-6, 0-6
2022-10-01vs LA - Canyon CoyotesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Susan Warner vs Andrea Hutchman / Andrea Kinloch6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
VICKY TRINH
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Emma Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
India Mandelkern
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Michelle Crossman
published
3.27
Susan Warner
published
3.26
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cheryl Wei
published 3.5
3.23
Ali Laventhol
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Langus
published 3.5
3.09
Maria Starn
published
3.06
Katherine Ferguson
published
2.99
Yasaman Barmaki
published
Ginger Vasquez
published 3
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
Kaleigh Malloy
published
Sarah Nist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Starn + Katherine Ferguson1437% gamesnot enough data
Susan Warner + Allison Langus2347% gamesnot enough data
Emma Gardner + India Mandelkern033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Ferguson + Kaleigh Malloy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
VICKY TRINH
163W–101L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Emma Gardner
23W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
4
India Mandelkern
41W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Michelle Crossman
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Wei
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Allison Langus
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Maria Starn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Katherine Ferguson
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Yasaman Barmaki
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Ginger Vasquez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kaleigh Malloy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Nist
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.