Teams

NOHO - Lucky Strings

2025 40 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.0 Flight

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-07vs Corpus Dolls w BallsWon 31
W#1 DoublesJana Gray / Courtney Keller Davis vs Grace Hammack / Tisha Belcher6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCassy Henderson vs Rosita Saenz6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Broadbent / Kelly King vs Beverly Montgomery / Amanda Pruett6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Battle / Janet Beckman vs Grais Banks / ISLA LARA5-7, 5-7
2025-06-06vs Mission-Hot Chili AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Beckman / Cassy Henderson vs Yolanda Perkins / Jo Ann Newman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Broadbent / Chery Fuller vs Rosario Martinez / Beki Hall6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJana Gray / Courtney Keller Davis vs Licia Cerrate-Reinoso / Adriana Canales6-1, 6-2
2025-06-06vs San Antonio Dominion DollsLost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Broadbent / Kelly King vs Nancy Taft / Jeanne Philippus4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCassy Henderson vs Marisa Gossweiler1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJana Gray / Chery Fuller vs Jennifer Campos / Karla Soto3-6, 3-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Beckman / Courtney Keller Davis vs Evita Castro / Heather Wilkinson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Shannon Broadbent
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Cassy Henderson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Courtney Keller Davis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Yvette Gwynne
published
Chery Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Aurora Robles
published 3
2.59
Jana Gray
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Janet Beckman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tina Battle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jana Gray + Courtney Keller Davis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Broadbent
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cassy Henderson
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Courtney Keller Davis
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Yvette Gwynne
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Chery Fuller
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Jana Gray
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Janet Beckman
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Tina Battle
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.