Teams

MSIL 5.5 Mixed Combo Hogan-Decatur

2023 Fall Combo Mixed · 5.5 Mixed Combo 2

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesBob Lyons / Amy Armstrong vs Bill Poorman / Jenny Sun6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Cleary / Amy Cleary vs Brett Henneberg / Rini Stoltz7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRJ Podeschi / Kara Knepp vs Steve Grady / Lesha Threewit6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesBob Lyons / Amy Armstrong vs Brett Henneberg / Rini Stoltz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRJ Podeschi / Kara Knepp vs Nicholas Troehler / Jenny Sun6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLoretta Hedges / Ted Norbits vs Erik Siembab / Angelia Neeley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Cleary / Amy Cleary vs Ravi Singhal / Lesha Threewit6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Comerford / Bob Lyons vs Nicholas Troehler / Rini Stoltz6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLoretta Hedges / Ted Norbits vs Keith Evans / Lesha Threewit6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Cleary / Brian Cleary vs Ravi Singhal / Kirsten Evans6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Comerford / Brian Anselmo vs Steve Grady / Angelia Neeley6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBrian Anselmo / Megan Comerford vs Nicholas Troehler / Kirsten Evans6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonald Miller / Janet Hogan vs Bill Poorman / Margaret Poorman6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRJ Podeschi / Mandi Podeschi vs Keith Evans / Angelia Neeley6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMegan Comerford / Brian Anselmo vs Kristen Levine / Brett Henneberg6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMandi Podeschi / RJ Podeschi vs Margaret Poorman / Bill Poorman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Mixed Combo 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL 5.5 Mixed Combo Hogan-Decatur000000
2MSIL 5.5 Mixed Combo Stoltz-Bloomington000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Megan Comerford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Amy Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.77
Bob Lyons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brian Cleary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Kara Knepp
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Brian Anselmo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Janet Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Loretta Hedges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
RJ Podeschi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ted Norbits
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loretta Hedges + Bob Lyons303 matchesnot enough data
Loretta Hedges + Ted Norbits213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Comerford + Brian Anselmo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Comerford
33W–31L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Amy Armstrong
87W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Bob Lyons
24W–13L career · type S · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brian Cleary
9W–2L career · type M · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kara Knepp
55W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Brian Anselmo
7W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Hogan
38W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Loretta Hedges
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
RJ Podeschi
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Norbits
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.