Teams

IRMSL/Whittington/40&Over7.0MXD

2024 IRMSL Mixed 40 & OVER · 7.0 T

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Galla / Christopher Burkhardt vs Anne Kuehne / Diego Varon6-2, 6-1
2024-03-12vs Buttonwood - NeelyWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Burkhardt / Susan Yeager vs Steven Robertson / Marie-Paule Cafmeyer7-5, 7-5
2024-02-20vs Buttonwood - NeelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrigite Babine / Christopher Burkhardt vs Caresse Chase / Niels Gundesen6-0, 6-3
2024-01-30vs Buttonwood - NeelyLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Whittington / Christopher Burkhardt vs Regan Chatel / Glenn Gowens5-7, 2-6
2024-01-23vs Magnolia Lakes - SchalzWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Burkhardt / Susan Yeager vs RYAN Flores / Danel Guerra6-4, 6-4
2024-01-09vs Buttonwood - NeelyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrigite Babine / Christopher Burkhardt vs Nancy Lewandowski / Craig Hall6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 T have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Brigite Babine
published 3.5
Adam Horvit
published 3.5
3.16
Christopher Burkhardt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Felipe Wells
published
Kathy Galla
published
Kevin DiLallo
published
Marilyn Horvit
published
Maureen Holley
published
Michael Owen
published
Susan Whittington
published
Susan Yeager
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin DiLallo + Maureen Holley5358% gamesnot enough data
Michael Owen + Maureen Holley303 matchesnot enough data
Brigite Babine + Christopher Burkhardt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brigite Babine
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Adam Horvit
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Burkhardt
72W–82L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Felipe Wells
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Galla
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin DiLallo
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Horvit
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Holley
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Owen
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Whittington
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Yeager
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.