Teams

Merriss 3.0 40

2023 Spring 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 · 3.0 Adult 40 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Alexis Hambrick
published 3.5
2.84
Elizabeth Lotz
published
2.69
Christy Hamm
published 3
2.61
Kristin Merriss
published
2.41
Mary McDuffa
published
2.38
Tanya Baugh
published
2.35
Sheary McLendon
published
2.25
Alexia Sandlin
published 3
1.90
Liz Wilcoxson
published
Ella Bevis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Lotz + Alexis Hambrick7652% games−0.4% vs expected
Sheary McLendon + Christy Hamm91151% games−4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexis Hambrick
22W–17L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Elizabeth Lotz
25W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.84
3
Christy Hamm
35W–29L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Kristin Merriss
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Mary McDuffa
3W–19L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Tanya Baugh
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38
Sheary McLendon
32W–31L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
3
Alexia Sandlin
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.25
Liz Wilcoxson
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
1.90
Ella Bevis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.