Teams

Hudson

2024 Adult 40&Over-PB · Men 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-02vs Pinebelt 40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Bonner / Dennis Granberry vs Douglas Branam / Rick Blackledge1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Norris / Todd Maddox vs Nicolas Quintana Ashwell / Alfonso Preziosi2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJavier Barquero / Doug McElroy vs Jamie Massengale / Ed Assaf3-6, 1-6
2024-04-30vs Pinebelt 40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrent Benson / Todd Maddox vs Ben Norval / John Reid2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJavier Barquero vs Andrew Rhodes3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDoug McElroy / William Norris vs Jamie Massengale / Scotty McDaniel1-6, 3-6
2024-04-22vs Pinebelt 40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRaymond Hudson / Brent Benson vs Jamie Massengale / Andrew Rhodes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Maddox / Javier Barquero vs Dave Kronlage / Rick Blackledge3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDoug McElroy / William Norris vs Alfonso Preziosi / Scotty McDaniel1-6, 2-6
2024-04-20vs Pinebelt 40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrent Benson / Raymond Hudson vs Douglas Branam / Ben Norval2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Norris / Doug McElroy vs John Reid / Dab McMurray3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJavier Barquero / Todd Maddox vs Ed Assaf / Alfonso Preziosi3-6, 2-6
2024-04-16vs Pinebelt 40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrent Benson / Raymond Hudson vs Ben Norval / Ed Assaf2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Maddox / Doug McElroy vs Douglas Branam / Alfonso Preziosi3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Brent Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dennis Granberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Doug McElroy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Greg Butler
published
Javier Barquero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mike Bonner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Norris
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raymond Hudson + Brent Benson033 matchesnot enough data
Doug McElroy + William Norris033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brent Benson
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
Dennis Granberry
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Doug McElroy
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Butler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Javier Barquero
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Bonner
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Raymond Hudson
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Norris
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.