Teams

Janiszewski-Betancourt/META

2026 Combo 18 & over-META · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 12 11:00 AM
Liberty Bell Tennis Center
Sep 19 11:00 AM
Liberty Bell Tennis Center
Sep 26 11:00 AM
Liberty Bell Tennis Center
2026-09-02vs Hinkle/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesRaegan Goodson / Kirsten Hoskins vs Holli Cox / Julia Vargo6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Olivia Osborne vs Sarah LaGuardia / Jessica Taylor6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKari Holt / Ju Mo vs Mary Beth Shults-kumar / Lynne Little1-6, 0-6
2026-08-26vs Hinkle/METALost 03
L#1 DoublesMadga Cox / Olivia Osborne vs Anita Jilton / Mary Beth Shults-kumar2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Scott / Christina Betancourt vs Lynne Little / Shannon Hinkle3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Dean / Kirsten Hoskins vs Sarah LaGuardia / Makie Kordamiri3-6, 2-6
2026-08-19vs Hinkle/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesMadga Cox / Olivia Osborne vs Eve Little Bradford / Lydia Ferguson-Hoskins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaegan Goodson / Regan Jordan vs Holli Cox / Jessica Taylor5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKari Holt / Morgan Scott vs Sarah LaGuardia / Julia Vargo4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hinkle/META1021221
2Janiszewski-Betancourt/META0112535

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Ju Mo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Brittini Thacker
published 3.5
3.12
Madga Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jane Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Regan Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Christina Betancourt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Raegan Goodson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Kirsten Hoskins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Kari Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Barb Janiszewski
published 3
Olivia Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Dean + Kirsten Hoskins5447% games−8.0% vs expected
Olivia Osborne + Madga Cox314 matchesnot enough data
Regan Jordan + Kari Holt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ju Mo
24W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Brittini Thacker
19W–12L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Madga Cox
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
Jane Dean
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
Regan Jordan
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Christina Betancourt
5W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Raegan Goodson
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kirsten Hoskins
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kari Holt
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Barb Janiszewski
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
Olivia Osborne
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.