Teams

Crockett/GR

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 3.5 WOMEN-DAY

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-11vs TULSA: Irby/LFLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatherine Crockett / MaryCaroline Davis vs Lauren Lusardi / Emilee Irby6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKate G Green vs Michelle Pryer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly West / Molly Barker vs Iris Griffin / Beth Scruggs2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Johannsson vs Aja Howerton6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracie Pelotte / Kara Plaster vs Cindy Crowder / Laurel Engstrom6-7, 1-6
2024-10-22vs Devinney/GRLost 14
L#1 DoublesLouise Reilly / Lisa Johannsson vs Tracy Earls / Tracie Wilson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMaryCaroline Davis vs Janet Crockett6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Jmaeff / Oanh Stanger vs Haven Willis / Karen Young4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAllie Utley vs Rachel Monks7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKara Plaster / Leigh Roy vs Monica Auschwitz / Trisha Millington1-6, 5-7
2024-10-08vs Calabrese/LFLost 05
L#1 DoublesLouise Reilly / Tracie Pelotte vs Kristin Calabrese / Stephanie Zahn5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Redcorn vs Antonia Parchuri2-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Barker / Kelly West vs Cheryl Willis / Melynda Stone2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKate G Green vs Anissa Mcguire6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Roy / Lisa Johannsson vs Nancy Burris / Andrea Martin1-6, 2-6
2024-10-01vs Watling 3.5/SHLost 14
L#1 DoublesTonya Sanders / Louise Reilly vs Morgan Murry / Terry Largent1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMaryCaroline Davis vs Patterson Rooney6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Carabello / Kara Plaster vs Abbey Stallings / Martha Shadid2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Johannsson vs Kristin Hook2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTracie Pelotte / Leigh Roy vs Mary Katherine Woodliff / Laurie Wollmershauser2-6, 4-6
2024-09-24vs Melega/LFLost 14
L#1 DoublesTracie Pelotte / Tonya Sanders vs Traci Hazel / Corinne Johnson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKate G Green vs Monica Mitchell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Carabello / Lisa Johannsson vs Shelley Sheppard / Sarah Haddock1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAllie Utley vs Ruthie Pease6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesOanh Stanger / Jill Jmaeff vs Casandra Celestain / Denise Riley4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN-DAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Allie Utley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Johannsson
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.04
Michelle Carabello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Oanh Stanger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Kate G Green
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.81
Tracie Pelotte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Molly Barker
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.56
Kara Plaster
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.47
Jill Jmaeff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.14
Cynthia Elias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jessica Redcorn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Katherine Crockett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly West
published
Lauren Elias
published
Leigh Roy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Louise Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
MaryCaroline Davis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tonya Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie Pelotte + Jessica Redcorn9751% games+0.6% vs expected
Molly Barker + Kelly West0534% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Roy + Tracie Pelotte213 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Roy + Cynthia Elias033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allie Utley
24W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Lisa Johannsson
30W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Michelle Carabello
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Oanh Stanger
61W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
Kate G Green
48W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Tracie Pelotte
104W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Molly Barker
34W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Kara Plaster
15W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.56
Jill Jmaeff
81W–122L career · 8 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Cynthia Elias
30W–106L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.14
Jessica Redcorn
77W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Crockett
3W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelly West
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Elias
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Roy
17W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Louise Reilly
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
MaryCaroline Davis
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tonya Sanders
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.