Teams

BW-Holleran (18s 2.5W SP) Baywood Babes

2026 Neuse River Adult 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women 18 & over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesSharon Lay / Anna Starkey vs Geneva Colie / Beth Ramsey6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJennifer Holleran / Lynne Fornes vs Erin Robinson / Shelly Sutton6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLoretta Micheletto / Jenny Osborne vs Geneva Colie / Melinda Harrell7-6, 7-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Monshaw / Lynne Fornes vs Megan Pender / Marisa Montgomery6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRebecca Blount vs Geneva Colie6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Blount vs Erin Robinson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLoretta Micheletto / Erica Janak vs Melinda Harrell / Marisa Montgomery6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Holleran / Anna Starkey vs Beth Ramsey / Rhonda Abbott1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLynne Fornes / Anna Starkey vs Crystal Dawson / Megan Pender6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Colie (18s 2.5W SP) Another Freaking Deuce Ladies339918150
2BW-Holleran (18s 2.5W SP) Baywood Babes339921178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Rebecca Blount
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Lynne Fornes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Anna Starkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Jenny Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Jennifer Holleran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Loretta Micheletto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Sharon Lay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erica Janak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jodie Messimer
published
Susan Monshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Lay + Loretta Micheletto134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Monshaw + Lynne Fornes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Blount
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
Lynne Fornes
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Anna Starkey
4W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
Jenny Osborne
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Jennifer Holleran
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Loretta Micheletto
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sharon Lay
7W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Erica Janak
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jodie Messimer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Monshaw
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.