Teams

PH ORANGE

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-10vs LEBTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJay Calderone / Christin Johnson vs Celine DAmore / David Kannikal2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Bellows / Jessica Harms vs Jon Uman / Carla Gamet6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNick Politano / Michelle Campbell vs Arin Neucks / Rebecca Duque3-6, 4-6
2026-07-05vs NJ BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Bellows / Jessica Harms vs Brett Vladika / Lauren Rivas3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCandice Saxon / Mark Kalkus vs Thomas DelaFuente / Carrie Poulsen0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-28vs MC ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesJay Calderone / Karen Calderone vs John Truchel / Laura MacKe1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristin Johnson / Tom Robinson vs Jeremy Kossler / Denise Belk6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNick Politano / Lina Politano vs Matthew Williams / Jody Dart6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-14vs NJ YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Campbell / Charles Bellows vs Jessica Mitchell / Rafael Rosario2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNick Politano / Lina Politano vs Kimberly Bonczynski / Charles Snethen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJay Calderone / Christin Johnson vs Diana Guettlein / Corey Bagley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-07vs CCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristin Johnson / Tom Robinson vs Andrew Banks / Lisa Banks1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Calderone / Jay Calderone vs Drew Damiano / Kerri Luther3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Campbell / Charles Bellows vs Wes Booysen / Olivia Booysen6-0, 6-1
2026-05-31vs SS-LGT BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJay Calderone / Karen Calderone vs Julie Clapham / Eric Mayer1-6, 1-6
2026-05-24vs LEBTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Kalkus / Candice Saxon vs Heyden Pue / Tanya Cote2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTom Robinson / Prairie Robinson vs Kiersten Paul / Richard Selim5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Bellows / Karen Calderone vs Lisa Mullett / Vageesh Kumar6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC YELLOW7015618163
2DTP RED6118310131
3Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.06116513164
4JCC GREEN6115617163
5LEBTC GREEN6113818186
6SS-LGT BLUE5214717152
7LTA-Q ORANGE5213819172
8LTA-Q BLUE5212921185
9BP RED5212922209
10LTA-Q RED5212923191
11CPV NAVY4211718142
12SH GREEN4211720147
13SKY PURPLE4312921176
14GTC RED34101126195
15MC ORANGE34101126211
16CCC GREEN34101127225
17NJ YELLOW3481328213
18HG ORANGE2410820149
19NJ GOLD25101125197
20BRMST BLUE2591226206
21HV RED2571431212
22LTFC BLUE1651632203
23LTFC RED0601836216
24PH ORANGE0751634216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Tom Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Mark Kalkus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Karen Calderone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Nick Politano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Michelle Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Jay Calderone
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Christin Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Charles Bellows
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Lina Politano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Candice Saxon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.19
Jessica Harms
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Prairie Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Saxon + Mark Kalkus0541% games+1.5% vs expected
Nick Politano + Lina Politano15856% games−6.2% vs expected
Karen Calderone + Jay Calderone72042% games−12.9% vs expected
Charles Bellows + Jessica Harms3256% gamesnot enough data
Prairie Robinson + Tom Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Charles Bellows + Michelle Campbell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Robinson
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
Mark Kalkus
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Karen Calderone
40W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Nick Politano
99W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Michelle Campbell
17W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Jay Calderone
33W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Christin Johnson
9W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Charles Bellows
86W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Lina Politano
71W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Candice Saxon
61W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jessica Harms
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Prairie Robinson
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.