Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Jennifer Seto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Rashmi Munot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Shelley Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Bridget Cash
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Anh-Vi Dao
published 4
3.70
Gloria Han
published 4
3.65
Eleni Baxter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Marina Obyrne
published
3.58
Julie Colwell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Katie Schmidt
published
3.55
Yejoo Eun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Deborah Getz
published 3.5
3.51
Joanne Callahan
published
3.48
Jennifer Freedman
published
3.45
Eunjung Chang
published 3.5
3.37
Meilani Hendrawidjaja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Amber Johnsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Missy Robinson
published
3.19
Tara Maddala
published
3.15
Katherine Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Seto + Rashmi Munot9363% games+5.1% vs expected
Deborah Getz + Amber Johnsen3352% games+3.1% vs expected
Julie Colwell + Bridget Cash2836% games−4.7% vs expected
Missy Robinson + Yejoo Eun303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Seto + Deborah Getz213 matchesnot enough data
Rashmi Munot + Jennifer Freedman033 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Getz + Katie Schmidt303 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Getz + Yejoo Eun303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Seto
34W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Rashmi Munot
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
Shelley Meyer
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Bridget Cash
17W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Anh-Vi Dao
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Gloria Han
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Eleni Baxter
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Marina Obyrne
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.65
Julie Colwell
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Katie Schmidt
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Yejoo Eun
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Deborah Getz
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Joanne Callahan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jennifer Freedman
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Eunjung Chang
13W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Meilani Hendrawidjaja
40W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Amber Johnsen
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Missy Robinson
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Tara Maddala
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Katherine Li
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.