Teams

Eagle Harbor - Jones

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-10vs Duval/Johnson/40&Over3.5WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKandee Townsend / Jolene Hamel vs Danielle Euwema / Amarillys Rodriguez2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Gillan vs Lan Nguyen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Kibbe / Kristen Schermerhorn vs Karen Meyer / Lisa Rangeo6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGreta Pacilio / Lori Aiosa vs Kaya Frechette / Vanessa Holland7-5, 6-4
2025-03-23vs Julington Creek - BermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Schoof / Greta Pacilio vs Megan Hendricks / Frances Sanfiorenzo7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-16vs Duval/Johnson/40&Over3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Tameka Bezue-Jackson vs Jessica Downs / Sue Newman5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Schermerhorn / Sheri Woods vs Janice Brinker / Jennifer Osbeck3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGail Olsen / Jill Waroff vs Judibelle Roman / Karen Meyer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs San Jose - WiseWon 10
W#2 DoublesKandee Townsend / Kimberly Schoof vs Dawn Siebenhaar / BETSEY WINSLOW1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Heather Kibbe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Becky Gillan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Tameka Bezue-Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Kandee Townsend
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jill Schmidt
published
Andrea Sullivan
published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Wentz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Aimee Davidow
published 3.5
3.23
Greta Pacilio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Kristen Schermerhorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Lori Aiosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Gail Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Stefannie Godfrey
published
3.07
Jolene Hamel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jill Waroff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Mehgan Moore
published
3.01
Sheri Woods
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Deana Jones
published 3
Julie Stofan
published
Kimberly Schoof
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Schermerhorn + Heather Kibbe5162% games−1.8% vs expected
Kandee Townsend + Gail Olsen3350% games−9.7% vs expected
Jolene Hamel + Nancy Wentz4256% gamesnot enough data
Greta Pacilio + Heather Kibbe3263% gamesnot enough data
Kandee Townsend + Lori Aiosa404 matchesnot enough data
Jolene Hamel + Jill Waroff213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Schermerhorn + Gail Olsen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Kibbe
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Becky Gillan
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Tameka Bezue-Jackson
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kandee Townsend
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jill Schmidt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Andrea Sullivan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Wentz
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Aimee Davidow
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Greta Pacilio
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristen Schermerhorn
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Lori Aiosa
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Gail Olsen
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Stefannie Godfrey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jill Waroff
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Mehgan Moore
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sheri Woods
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Deana Jones
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Julie Stofan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Schoof
36W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.