Teams

WI Adult 18&O Women's Holding Team

2025 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over Women's Holding

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over Women's Holding
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 18&O Women's Holding Team000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kristin Bohl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elma Sia
published 2.5
Kristen Marten
published
Lynn Armitage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Bohl + Lynn Armitage2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Bohl
70W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
2.5
Elma Sia
0W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Marten
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Armitage
65W–75L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.