Teams

Deercreek CC Phillips

2025 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer Weekend · 6.5 W Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-13vs Southside AtkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Bernard / BJ Weyer vs Celestine Smith / Tracy Hodges1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Sayre / Julie Korsog vs Jennifer Medley / Debra Sussman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJody Layne / Carson Lee Phillips vs Angela Atkins / Brooke Bolton6-3, 6-4
2025-09-10vs Duval/BulginLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Fritz / Carolyn Whittall vs Maggie Williams / Emily Painter3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Kurtz / Teresa Eliason vs Meredith Hoffmann / Melanie McGrath3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJody Layne / Pat Maloney-Fay vs Dawn Crawford / Leah Copham7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-02vs FYC KaneLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Bernard / BJ Weyer vs Elizabeth Smith / Ashley Helmick6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarson Lee Phillips / Carolyn Whittall vs Beth Kane / Sheri Goldstein2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Engelhardt / Pat Maloney-Fay vs Tammy Morreale / Caroline Welch5-7, 3-6
2025-07-26vs SJCC RoarLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Eliason / Karen Sayre vs Dixie McDaniel de Andrade / Nancy Hennessy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Engelhardt / Robin Braddock vs Heather Riley / Lauren Dealexandris3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Fritz / BJ Weyer vs Allison Wise / Margaret Samuels7-6, 3-5
2025-07-19vs Sawgrass RendzioLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Korsog / Ceci Hassan vs Brittany Darling / Lauren Stroker7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Braddock / Carolyn Whittall vs Beth Jones / Betsy Delcour7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarson Lee Phillips / Reba Shrewsbury vs Joan Grune / Vanessa Sutliff2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-12vs The Yards BarrettWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeresa Eliason / Ceci Hassan vs Monica Barrett / Katelyn Henninger6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Fritz / Jody Layne vs Faith Drennen / Ginger Weible6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBJ Weyer / Donna Bernard vs Barbra Aleman / Shannon Tofflemire6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Sharon Fritz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Teresa Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Carson Lee Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Pat Maloney-Fay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Ceci Hassan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Melissa Kurtz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
BJ Weyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carolyn Whittall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donna Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jody Layne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Korsog
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Sayre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Reba Shrewsbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Braddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Engelhardt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tina Schumacher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Fritz + Teresa Eliason11358% games+8.7% vs expected
Donna Bernard + BJ Weyer1440% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Engelhardt + Karen Sayre4157% gamesnot enough data
Donna Bernard + Reba Shrewsbury303 matchesnot enough data
Tina Schumacher + Reba Shrewsbury123 matchesnot enough data
Tina Schumacher + Stephanie Engelhardt213 matchesnot enough data
Reba Shrewsbury + Stephanie Engelhardt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Fritz
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Teresa Eliason
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Carson Lee Phillips
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Pat Maloney-Fay
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Ceci Hassan
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Melissa Kurtz
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
BJ Weyer
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carolyn Whittall
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Bernard
63W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jody Layne
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Korsog
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Sayre
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reba Shrewsbury
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Braddock
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Engelhardt
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Schumacher
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.