Teams

Daud (Alper JCC)

2024 MIAMIDADE Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-20vs Lujan (Deering Bay)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSPYROS PRANTALOS / Jonathan Sauce vs Samuel Libnic / Richard Mangas4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHugo Montiel / Gustavo Tijerino vs Henry Lujan / George Westring6-3, 6-2
2024-07-17vs Miami/Treto/50&over8.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesHugo Montiel / Genghiz Erden vs G Emerson Fales / Christian Walker6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-06vs Lujan (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Sauce / Hugo Montiel vs Jonathan Drucker / Luis Velis3-6, 2-6
2024-06-26vs Miami/Treto/50&over8.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesHugo Montiel / Miguel Miloslavich vs G Emerson Fales / Jesus Larranaga3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-05vs Miami/Treto/50&over8.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMiguel Miloslavich / Hugo Montiel vs JOSE IGNACIO GONZALEZ NUNEZ / Christian Walker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Hugo Montiel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.95
Leonard Chinchay
published
3.91
Jonathan Sauce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
3.77
Gregory Joseph
published 4
3.71
William Keunen
published
3.67
Lawrence Freedman
published
3.60
SPYROS PRANTALOS
published
3.60
Gustavo Tijerino
published 4
3.59
Genghiz Erden
published 4
3.43
Andres Gonzalez
published 3.5
Noel Barengo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Freedman + William Keunen6754% games+3.4% vs expected
Hugo Montiel + Miguel Miloslavich2545% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hugo Montiel
47W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
Leonard Chinchay
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Jonathan Sauce
65W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Miguel Miloslavich
24W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Gregory Joseph
36W–38L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
William Keunen
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Lawrence Freedman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
SPYROS PRANTALOS
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Gustavo Tijerino
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Genghiz Erden
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Andres Gonzalez
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Noel Barengo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.