Teams

Alachua/Centonze18&over9.0MXD

2025 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-19vs DB van RoySplit 11
W#2 DoublesDrae Centonze / Alyssa Ray vs Camilo Fita / Tanja Magoc6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBraedon Fulton / Nikki Perrino vs David Hou / Nour Oweiss1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-15vs DB van RoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Braedon Fulton vs Vincent LoCascio / Heather Gibson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNikki Perrino / Jonathan Mora vs David Hou / Nour Oweiss2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-08vs DB van RoyLost 12
L#1 DoublesNikki Perrino / Nicholas Tran vs Alejandro Pauly / Tanja Magoc3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBraedon Fulton - * / Morgan Jordan vs Spencer Neville / Nour Oweiss3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDrae Centonze / Wheeler Crawford vs Ekanong van Roy / Kevin Banes7-5, 6-3
2025-08-03vs DB van RoySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoey Palus / Kelly Banes vs Alejandro Pauly / Tanja Magoc5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDrae Centonze / Alyssa Ray vs Anita Rajasekhar / David Hou6-3, 6-1
2025-07-31vs DB van RoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBraedon Fulton / Nikki Perrino vs Peter Kim / Jenny Neelands6-3, 6-4
2025-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonny Reeder / Heather Gibson vs Morgan Jordan / Braedon Fulton - *5-7, 4-6
2025-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonny Reeder / Jenny Neelands vs Morgan Jordan / Braedon Fulton - *5-7, 3-6
2025-07-10vs DB van RoySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDrae Centonze / Wheeler Crawford vs Peter Kim / Tracey Bryant6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicholas Tran / Nikki Perrino vs Ekanong van Roy / Kevin Banes1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.36
Kelly Banes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Nikki Perrino
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Braedon Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
3.94
Wheeler Crawford
published
3.91
Alyssa Ray
published 4
Jonathan Mora
published
Sarah Perkins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Nikki Perrino
57W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Braedon Fulton
22W–23L career · 13 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.11
Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Alyssa Ray
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Jonathan Mora
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Perkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.