Teams

APR TEAL

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-25vs WP GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDarlene Lowrie / Lynn LaTorre vs Suzette Emerson / Bethany Sheldon1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCathy Shahan vs Tamara Bianchi6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Jane Miley vs Mindy Humphrey / Lauren Eddy3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Gilmore / Anne Angerman vs Angelique Manley / Kristen Hanson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-15vs WP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeidre Shanley / Kathleen McKern vs Nicole Parker / Sue Hickey2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCathy Shahan vs Minou Cramer6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Anne Angerman vs Alison Mizer / Diane Mapes4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJane Miley / Stacey Gilmore vs Ann Shiveley / Claudia Pillow2-6, 0-6
2021-07-13vs GTC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesKathleen McKern / Darlene Lowrie vs Sheri Wanamaker / Jodi Denton6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Alexandra Iseman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Leder / Cathy Shahan vs Lisa Winston / Alexandra Hopkins2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn LaTorre / Muffy Steinhoff vs VERA DIVENYI / Liz Magill4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-08vs SKY BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKathleen McKern / Vanessa Richards vs Jill Hess / Jeffra Frank7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLynn LaTorre vs Denise Briere6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Gilmore / Laura Whalin vs Heather Bacon / Katherine Sullivan7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Angerman / Cathy Shahan vs Laura Agelopoulos / Kim Brummond4-6, 0-6
2021-06-24vs DTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeidre Shanley / Vanessa Richards vs Sarah Killeen / Ilene Vivinetto4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCathy Shahan vs Lindsay Freeman6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen McKern / Lynn LaTorre vs Ashley Daidone / Georgia Gallagher5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacey Gilmore / Laura Whalin vs Elizabeth Kelly / Marilyn Dankner3-6, 2-6
2021-06-17vs CACM PINKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDarlene Lowrie / Vanessa Richards vs Sara Vanek / Rachel Nutt7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCathy Shahan vs Jameela Khadiwala6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathleen McKern / Connie Parris vs Tamra Nathan / Stephanie Mcgowan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Angerman / Laura Whalin vs Monique Wehrle / Emily Pruisner0-6, 2-6
2021-06-10vs CACM GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesCathy Shahan / Darlene Lowrie vs Bev Morrow / Mary Beth Church5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Gilmore vs Courtney Forman6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Whalin / Lynn LaTorre vs Caren Misky / Juli Bulloch6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMuffy Steinhoff / Anne Angerman vs Melanie Darden / Samantha Hanson1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darlene Lowrie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deidre Shanley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Cathy Shahan
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.15
Vanessa Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kathleen McKern
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.99
Stacey Gilmore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.87
Lynn LaTorre
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.79
Anne Angerman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Muffy Steinhoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jane Miley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Whalin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Laurie Leder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Shahan + Muffy Steinhoff4451% games+6.4% vs expected
Stacey Gilmore + Cathy Shahan2439% games−0.7% vs expected
Cathy Shahan + Darlene Lowrie2443% games−1.5% vs expected
Darlene Lowrie + Vanessa Richards4154% games−4.4% vs expected
Lynn LaTorre + Kathleen McKern41939% games−4.4% vs expected
Muffy Steinhoff + Lynn LaTorre0540% games−6.4% vs expected
Muffy Steinhoff + Jane Miley3345% games−7.4% vs expected
Stacey Gilmore + Lynn LaTorre033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darlene Lowrie
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Deidre Shanley
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Shahan
69W–81L career · 7 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Vanessa Richards
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kathleen McKern
22W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
Stacey Gilmore
24W–37L career · 6 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Lynn LaTorre
23W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Anne Angerman
32W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Muffy Steinhoff
34W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jane Miley
4W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Whalin
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Leder
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.