Teams

RB-Haywood/Pons Causing a Racquet (C 18s 7.5W)

2023 Neuse River Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-04vs GR-Haislip (C 18s 7.5W)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Land / Corinne Haywood vs Justine Barnes / Jill Davis3-6, 6-7
2023-10-03vs NB-Nuckolls (C 18s 7.5W)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Diane Pons vs Sharon Kibbe / Wendy Stallings1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-26vs GR-Haislip (C 18s 7.5W)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Maryann Cuellar vs Jill Davis / Justine Barnes3-6, 5-7
2023-09-24vs NB-Nuckolls (C 18s 7.5W)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Diane Pons vs Sharon Kibbe / Meridith Maddox Gibbs6-4, 6-3
2023-09-10vs NB-Nuckolls (C 18s 7.5W)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Suzan Martin vs Melissa Rankin / Maggie Warren6-3, 6-2
2023-08-29vs NB-Nuckolls (C 18s 7.5W)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Kerry Smith vs Missy Taylor / Helen Tyson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Corinne Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Monica Carlson
published
3.36
Diane Pons
published 3.5
3.26
Suzan Martin
published
3.19
Jessie Massey
published
3.07
Holly H Jennings
published
3.01
Maryann Cuellar
published
Molly Hostetler
published
Sabrina Lentz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Pons + Monica Carlson5263% games+23.5% vs expected
Sabrina Lentz + Monica Carlson3261% gamesnot enough data
Sabrina Lentz + Jessie Massey213 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Veluci-Marlow + Diane Pons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Monica Carlson
82W–25L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.45
3.5
Diane Pons
43W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Suzan Martin
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.26
Jessie Massey
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Holly H Jennings
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Roberta Veluci-Marlow
51W–46L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Maryann Cuellar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Hostetler
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sabrina Lentz
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.