Teams

GEPTA/Martinez/18&over/3.0W

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Alba Duarte
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Ilse Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Singles 24% · published
Jassivy Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Karime Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Kenia Salazar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Lorraine Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Paulina Nodal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Perla Manriquez Najera
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Priscilla Cervantes
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 41% · published
Rebecca Vega Renteria
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Roxana Luna
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Sofia Saenz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Valeria Chavez
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda + Roxana Luna8455% gamesnot enough data
Jassivy Hernandez + Paulina Nodal6265% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Jassivy Hernandez1634% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Vega Renteria + Karime Diaz2452% gamesnot enough data
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda + Ilse Martinez4162% gamesnot enough data
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza + Perla Manriquez Najera404 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Vega Renteria + Roxana Luna033 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Vega Renteria + Alba Duarte213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alba Duarte
21W–8L career · 17 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Eufemia Garcia
81W–125L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ilse Martinez
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
35W–28L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jassivy Hernandez
55W–42L career · 38 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karime Diaz
11W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenia Salazar
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
23W–21L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorraine Gonzalez
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paulina Nodal
16W–11L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Perla Manriquez Najera
11W–1L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Priscilla Cervantes
13W–8L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Vega Renteria
26W–16L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roxana Luna
25W–18L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sofia Saenz
14W–6L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valeria Chavez
15W–2L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.