Teams

Manor 3.5

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-12-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarijane Forde / Sherifa Fahmy vs Alixandria Lapp / Maria Elena Greene4-6, 3-6
2023-11-27vs Salty BallsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelley Donellan / Marijane Forde vs Erin Meehan / Jodi Murray0-6, 2-6
2023-11-03vs Match MakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelley Donellan / Marijane Forde vs Silvana Brinkman / Zoie Acadia3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Kelley Donellan
published
3.46
Dawn Willard
published 3.5
3.32
Marijane Forde
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Diana DePaul
published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Smith
published
3.05
Meredith Webb
published
3.02
Melissa Valencia
published
3.00
Cybelle Long
published 3.5
2.94
Sara Foulkes
published
Julie Gutierrez
published
Katie Poulos
published
Patty Lynch
published
Sherifa Fahmy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Smith + Melissa Valencia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Donellan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Dawn Willard
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Marijane Forde
36W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Christina Shioutakon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diana DePaul
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Smith
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Meredith Webb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Melissa Valencia
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Cybelle Long
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Sara Foulkes
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
Julie Gutierrez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Poulos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Lynch
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherifa Fahmy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.