Teams

West Shore Trapp

2025 USTA 40 & Over League · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.95 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-11vs RCW-HufnagelLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindee Trapp / Teague Wright vs Jennifer Rakoczy / Catherine Hill6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Sowmya Surapaneni vs Abby Aukamp / Kelly Kurtz1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Natalie Grubb vs Tammy Miller / Mary Chairs7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-07vs Hershey Racquet Club- CorcoranSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Cindee Trapp vs Michele Harnden / Debbie Bray4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMelise Rowan vs Melanie Mathews6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeague Wright / Natalie Grubb vs Shannon Corcoran / Katherine Aitken3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Sowmya Surapaneni vs Sue Shema / Kristin Jeffries6-2, 6-4
2025-08-03vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Cindee Trapp vs Michelle Keener / Tiffany Marino6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Becky Katz6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Teague Wright vs Marcy Blitz / Tia Tedder6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth McCrea / Sowmya Surapaneni vs Heather Arters / Colleen Funk5-7, 2-6
2025-07-21vs Wisehaven - MichelsWon 31
W#1 DoublesNatalie Grubb / Cindee Trapp vs Laura Barwick / Janet Krusen6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMelise Rowan vs Laura Lanza6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Jane Acquilano vs Cathy Preisendorfer / Lynne Beck6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Izabela Nitecki vs Anna Lamond / Kimberly Sandhu3-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs Hempfield - SchlageterLost 13
L#1 DoublesCindee Trapp / Natalie Grubb vs Maureen McElrone / Audrey Lubas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelise Rowan vs Madhavi Reddy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Sowmya Surapaneni vs Teresa Clark / Beth Apetrior6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIzabela Nitecki / Kateri Martin vs Margaret Beaver / Lucinda Mauro6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-08vs Hempfield CovellLost 04
L#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Melissa Ruggiero vs LeeAnn Palmer / Nancy Opilo4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Michele Mccartney0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeague Wright / Sowmya Surapaneni vs Lori Tully / Karen Schaufert3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeth McCrea / Susan Kurtz vs Jill Frey / Lisa Stokes1-6, 0-6
2025-06-23vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 40
W#1 DoublesTeague Wright / Cindee Trapp vs Heather Hershey / Tiffany Marino7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Becky Katz6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Deborah Klenotic vs Heather Arters / Marla Triano6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie Grubb / Melissa Ruggiero vs Colleen Funk / Anne Garber6-1, 6-0
2025-06-16vs RCW-HufnagelSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNatalie Grubb / Melissa Ruggiero vs Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren / Mary Chairs4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Jacquelin Eby6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelise Rowan / Sowmya Surapaneni vs Kelly Kurtz / Abby Aukamp0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Ringquist / Kristie Teets vs Bonnie Westheaffer / Tina Loose5-7, 2-6
2025-06-06vs Hempfield CovellLost 13
L#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Natalie Grubb vs Karen Schaufert / Nancy Opilo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Michele Mccartney5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCindee Trapp / Teague Wright vs Heather Shelton / Patricia Lawrence6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Beth McCrea vs Lori Tully / Lisa Stokes5-7, 3-6
2025-05-12vs Hempfield - SchlageterWon 40
W#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Cindee Trapp vs Maureen McElrone / Beth Apetrior6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Susan Seeley6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Melise Rowan vs Margaret Beaver / Linda Eagle6-5
W#3 DoublesKateri Martin / Susan Kurtz vs Madhavi Reddy / Melissa Landis6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Melise Rowan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.92
Jane Acquilano
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.82
Natalie Grubb
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.79
Izabela Nitecki
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Cindee Trapp
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.78
Deborah Klenotic
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Linda Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Dawn Toutkaldjian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Sowmya Surapaneni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Teague Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Carolyn Hopwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Beth McCrea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Kateri Martin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Kristie Teets
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Melissa Ruggiero
published
Vicki Ringquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Klenotic + Linda Donnelly6068% games+15.1% vs expected
Sowmya Surapaneni + Melissa Ruggiero5359% games+11.2% vs expected
Kateri Martin + Izabela Nitecki4163% games+9.9% vs expected
Linda Donnelly + Izabela Nitecki12173% games+6.4% vs expected
Deborah Klenotic + Dawn Toutkaldjian5354% games+5.7% vs expected
Carolyn Hopwood + Vicki Ringquist3250% games+5.4% vs expected
Sowmya Surapaneni + Teague Wright2551% games+5.3% vs expected
Kateri Martin + Teague Wright15261% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melise Rowan
25W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Jane Acquilano
134W–97L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Natalie Grubb
78W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Izabela Nitecki
113W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Cindee Trapp
115W–100L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Deborah Klenotic
95W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Linda Donnelly
240W–101L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dawn Toutkaldjian
182W–118L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Sowmya Surapaneni
71W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
Teague Wright
175W–128L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Carolyn Hopwood
140W–156L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Beth McCrea
150W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kateri Martin
118W–125L career · 8 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Kristie Teets
86W–71L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Melissa Ruggiero
50W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Ringquist
80W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.