Teams

SS-LGT RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs LEBTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Bills / Elizabeth Freestone vs Kathleen Samuelli / Michelle Davis6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMISSY GOLDBERG vs Lisa Stark6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Gould / Toni Chalmers vs Cami Schaefer / Brooke Sterling2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Angell / Christina Schwartz vs Claudia Swanson / Gretchen Burr6-4, 6-3
2024-07-11vs KC-RH GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Bills / Elizabeth Freestone vs Stacey Persichetti / Jennifer Gonyea6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMISSY GOLDBERG vs Amanda King6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Jackson / Toni Chalmers vs Lori Thorp / Kimberly Borchelt7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGinger Angell / Jennifer Henkel vs Kristen Weeks / Holley Miller1-6, 4-6
2024-07-07vs CM PINKWon 40
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Bills / Sherri Partlow vs Taylor Pardun / Katie McCrimmon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMISSY GOLDBERG vs Michelle Eidson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Jackson / Christina Schwartz vs Margaret Deline / Lea VanSchaack6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesToni Chalmers / Elizabeth Freestone vs Holly Flannigan / Cindy Sawyer7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-27vs KC-RH REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / MISSY GOLDBERG vs Beth Beers / Kelly Lipsteuer6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTammy Gould vs Laura Grush4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesToni Chalmers / Sherri Partlow vs Connie Grieshaber / Lynne Jansons6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Jackson / Christina Schwartz vs Kathleen Keating / Anita Kinder6-1, 6-1
2024-06-20vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Christina Schwartz vs Alison Cejka / Amy Niese2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTammy Gould vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGinger Angell / Jennifer Henkel vs Nancy Montini / Carol Parrish3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSherri Partlow / Toni Chalmers vs Kathy Haberman / Beatriz Bonnet6-1, 6-1
2024-06-13vs CCC NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Bills / Sherri Partlow vs Beth Pestotnik / Becca Damiano2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTammy Gould vs Kerry Barker1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Christina Schwartz vs Adriana Evans / Lori Manzer1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGinger Angell / Jennifer Henkel vs Lindsay Andrew / Jessica Larzelere2-6, 4-6
2024-06-06vs PH GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Christina Schwartz vs Tracy Wells / Kathleen Kenny Davia2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinger Angell / Toni Chalmers vs Nhung Van / Kristin Overton1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTammy Gould / Sherri Partlow vs Lori Silliman / Barbara Pryor6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Jocelyn Bills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
MISSY GOLDBERG
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Christina Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Elizabeth Freestone
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.14
Sherri Partlow
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Jennifer Henkel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Tammy Gould
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Toni Chalmers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Ginger Angell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Chalmers + Sherri Partlow7067% games+14.1% vs expected
Toni Chalmers + Elizabeth Freestone13264% games+11.8% vs expected
Toni Chalmers + Christina Schwartz4258% games+3.0% vs expected
Ginger Angell + Jennifer Henkel261554% games+0.7% vs expected
Jocelyn Bills + MISSY GOLDBERG6756% games+0.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Freestone + MISSY GOLDBERG3255% games+0.1% vs expected
Jocelyn Bills + Sherri Partlow12854% games−1.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Freestone + Sherri Partlow131151% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jocelyn Bills
108W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
MISSY GOLDBERG
90W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christina Schwartz
105W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Elizabeth Freestone
163W–103L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Sherri Partlow
108W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jennifer Henkel
94W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tammy Gould
68W–109L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Toni Chalmers
72W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Ginger Angell
130W–110L career · 5 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.