Teams

Ch.Byrum18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-04vs Pa.Coltrera18AWon 41
W#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Holly Moravec vs Paige Coltrera / Lindsey Howard4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDebra Hauge vs Ashley Knowles2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCheri Byrum / Ryland Herring vs Taylor Cheek / Meagan Heath6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Jenny Cimino6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Foster / Susan Bowers vs Laura Simson / Leah Weston6-0, 6-1
2026-04-27vs Ta.Backus18ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesHolly Moravec / Susan Bowers vs Alexandra Kovacs / Cathy Werder4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Karen Foster vs Shannon Clarkson / Dawn Berry4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Angela Myers6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCheri Byrum / Ryland Herring vs Lauren Kilpatrick / Madison Sijon6-3, 6-2
2026-04-20vs Ch.Mccorquodale18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Dorothy Nance vs Sarah Ferguson / Carol Rosser6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebra Hauge / Ryland Herring vs Kristen Muse / Garnett Webb6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCheri Byrum / Paula Bullock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-13vs Na.Norris18AWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Ryland Herring vs Sharon Lambe / Ashley Lindeman6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHope Pflaum / Dorothy Nance vs Sarah Kingery / Lauren Hardwick2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLora Barnett vs Kate Peckham6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Bullock / Michelle Pilos vs Dawn Rusnak / Nadia Dahir7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-27vs Co.Hicks18A3.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Bowers / Annette Tavernaro vs MaryKate Harris / Emlyn Henley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Moravec / Dorothy Nance vs Sheri Erhart / Charlotte Mercer4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesLora Barnett vs Courtney Hicks6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRyland Herring / Michelle Pilos vs Rebecca Bowen / Janice Garside4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Je.Wolborsky18ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesHolly Moravec / Annette Tavernaro vs Marie Gelston / Audrey Hollett5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheri Byrum / Debra Hauge vs Sharon Fadelici / Eliza Bobryshev2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLora Barnett vs Jill Dykes7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Dorothy Nance vs Priscilla Nanney / Norma Wolcott6-1, 6-0
2026-03-09vs Ke.Day18ALost 13
W#1 DoublesDebra Hauge / Ryland Herring vs Abigail Douek / Mandi Chappell6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHope Pflaum / Karen Foster vs Kelly Day / Cayt Kirkman1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPaula Bullock vs Kristin Esham1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDorothy Nance / Melanie Waldron vs Zoe Whitesell / Jaime Gaskins4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Melanie Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Ryland Herring
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Annette Tavernaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Lora Barnett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Debra Hauge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Holly Moravec
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Dorothy Nance
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Hope Pflaum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Susan Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Paula Bullock
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Cheri Byrum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Michelle Pilos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Hauge + Hope Pflaum5159% gamesnot enough data
Debra Hauge + Ryland Herring4159% gamesnot enough data
Paula Bullock + Michelle Pilos224 matchesnot enough data
Hope Pflaum + Ryland Herring134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bowers + Annette Tavernaro213 matchesnot enough data
Paula Bullock + Ryland Herring213 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Waldron + Dorothy Nance213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Waldron
15W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Ryland Herring
80W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Annette Tavernaro
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Lora Barnett
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Holly Moravec
40W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Dorothy Nance
7W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Hope Pflaum
149W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Susan Bowers
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Paula Bullock
100W–139L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cheri Byrum
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Michelle Pilos
29W–51L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.