Teams

Wild Blue 40 Love

2026 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-14vs River Strand Net ProphetsWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Huffman / Svetlana Janglin vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Susanne Booth6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nanelle Rosales vs Annmarie Curle / Bernadette King7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTambra Ford / Celia Pena vs Penny Franklin / Chris Poole6-2, 7-6
2026-03-07vs SARASOTA/CarrettaLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Sheila Engert vs Cindy Rosenberg / Nina Mortazavi1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Gabriella Vayshelboym7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Linda Radovich vs Kimberly LaLima / Beth Robinson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Melissa Caldwell / Carrie Carretta1-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs The LWR PlayersWon 31
L#1 DoublesMartina Kralickova / Tambra Ford vs Laura Severson / Hillary Nielsen4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Leslie Saslow6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Radovich / Nicole Thompson vs Kerri Helms / Geneil Roberts6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Maler / Sheila Engert vs Christine Tosti / Karen Patchell6-4, 6-0
2026-02-21vs LWR NicholsonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Linda Radovich vs Natalie Bloch / Nia Esposito6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Marcia Frost6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Moran / Donna Dubinsky vs Christine Handel / Elizabeth Goelz1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nanelle Rosales vs Barbara Cogen / Heidi Cox6-1, 6-2
2026-02-14vs TPC Windsor 40 4.0Won 31
L#1 DoublesSheila Engert / Karen Huffman vs Tanya Keith / Coquina Homer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLinda Radovich vs Sandra Poston6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTambra Ford / Cathy Maler vs SallyAnn Mastropietro / Anne Feely2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nanelle Rosales vs Marsha Timm / Michelle McGrath6-2, 6-1
2026-02-09vs The LWR PlayersWon 40
W#1 DoublesDonna Dubinsky / Kathy Rain vs Christine Tosti / Karen Patchell6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Betty Jo Zeigler6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Huffman / Tambra Ford vs Sheila Sosa / Hillary Nielsen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCathy Maler / Nancy Moran vs Bernadette Waterman / Geneil Roberts6-3, 6-3
2026-02-07vs River Strand Net ProphetsWon 40
W#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Martina Kralickova vs Nancy Finman / Kim Reiser2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Jodie Wang6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Nicole Thompson vs Kristen Keyser / Emily Franklin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCelia Pena / Sheila Engert vs Annmarie Curle / Judi Wilson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-24vs SARASOTA/CarrettaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Karen Huffman vs Yudi Carpenter / Cindy Rosenberg5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Cristina Tomadin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Radovich / Svetlana Janglin vs Dana Slackman / Mari-Ann Kucharek7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Nicole Thompson vs Carrie Carretta / Melissa Caldwell1-6, 3-6
2026-01-17vs LWR NicholsonWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Martina Kralickova vs Karen Nicholson / Carol Frazier - (DQ)*5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Christie Uihlein6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSue Silberbusch / Nicole Thompson vs Lauren Larkin / Natalie Bloch6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Rain / Donna Dubinsky vs Karen Collins / Elizabeth Goelz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-10vs TPC Windsor 40 4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Linda Radovich vs Sally Joyce / Jennifer Haahs6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHong Li vs Anne Feely6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Martina Kralickova vs Ann Davy / Marsha Timm7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Moran / Celia Pena vs Kathy Sawyer / SallyAnn Mastropietro6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Hong Li
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Linda Radovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Jennifer Butcher
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.86
Sheila Engert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Tambra Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Cathy Maler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Nicole Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Nanelle Rosales
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Sue Silberbusch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Karen Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Martina Kralickova
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Kathy Rain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Donna Dubinsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Celia Pena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Nancy Moran
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stacie Temple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Engert + Cathy Maler8159% games+5.0% vs expected
Donna Dubinsky + Kathy Rain232650% games+1.6% vs expected
Tambra Ford + Kathy Rain3348% games+0.6% vs expected
Svetlana Janglin + Martina Kralickova8456% games−5.0% vs expected
Jennifer Butcher + Linda Radovich2454% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Butcher + Sheila Engert3254% gamesnot enough data
Tambra Ford + Sheila Engert3256% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Janglin + Kathy Rain5065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hong Li
16W–1L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.05
4
Linda Radovich
85W–81L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Jennifer Butcher
20W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.90
Sheila Engert
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Tambra Ford
106W–93L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Cathy Maler
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Nicole Thompson
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Nanelle Rosales
74W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Sue Silberbusch
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Karen Huffman
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Martina Kralickova
91W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Kathy Rain
91W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Donna Dubinsky
62W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Celia Pena
68W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
Nancy Moran
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
Stacie Temple
57W–39L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.