Teams

Hammock Bay - Ramer

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-07vs COLLIER/Brooks/55&over7.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy McCune / Laura Murphy vs Laura Buzzetta / Sharon Bartle3-6, 1-6
2024-02-29vs Cambier - DoubleTrouble -TrombleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Hattenbach / Jane Hadley vs Maureen Sexson / Beth Conklin3-6, 3-6
2024-02-22vs Tarpon Cove - SchultzSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJane Hadley / Susan Miller vs Lynda Giannetta / Sherry Lambert6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGloria Anderson / Patti Ramer vs Nancy Schultz / Shelley Whalen4-6, 6-7
2024-02-15vs Longshore Lake - PallerLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatti Ramer / Isabelle Adly vs Lynn Damico / Clarissa Valdivia2-6, 2-6
2024-02-08vs Players Club - SackettWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy McCune / Gloria Anderson vs Claire Morris / Karen Terzano6-2, 6-1
2024-01-18vs Vineyards - KronenLost 02
L#2 DoublesJane Hadley / Nancy McCune vs Jennifer Procacci / Marie Zinno2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Ramer / Gloria Anderson vs Ellen Hersey / Jennifer Johnson5-7, 1-6
2024-01-11vs Marco Ymca - ConteLost 01
L#1 DoublesIsabelle Adly / Jane Hadley vs Sally Mattke / Laraine Segar6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sarah Griffin
published
3.29
Susan Juels
published
3.28
Laura Murphy
published
3.21
Linda Streett
published
3.15
Nancy McCune
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Gloria Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Jane Hadley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Maureen Huscroft
published
Patti Ramer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Crane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Streett + Laura Murphy5650% games−0.6% vs expected
Gloria Anderson + Patti Ramer41542% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Nancy McCune5550% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Anderson + Maureen Huscroft123 matchesnot enough data
Jane Hadley + Maureen Huscroft033 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Huscroft + Paula Crane123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Griffin
110W–61L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.50
Susan Juels
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Laura Murphy
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Linda Streett
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Nancy McCune
75W–143L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Gloria Anderson
57W–73L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Jane Hadley
77W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Maureen Huscroft
54W–43L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.90
Patti Ramer
44W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.