Teams

Matheny,STCC,SB,40WN/6.5C

2022 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 Shrev

19 players · average NTRP 3.30 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kyla Fulco
published
3.24
Laura Gooszen
published
3.13
Stephanie Bass
published
3.11
Courtney Matheny
published 3.5
3.10
Darlene Dean
published 3.5
3.08
Sharon Regard
published
3.07
Michaelann Nichols
published
3.05
Mary Tipton
published
3.04
Christie Cox
published 3.5
3.01
Mary Jayroe
published
2.94
Kathy Barlow
published
2.89
Lila Knicely
published
2.85
Alisa Cotton
published 3
2.84
Tiffany Bell
published
2.84
Ann Harvey
published 3
2.83
Rhonda Terracciano
published
2.76
Jocelyn Hooper
published
2.58
Melinda Hernandez
published
Katharine Knicely
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Terracciano + Christie Cox2347% games+2.8% vs expected
Darlene Dean + Laura Gooszen4352% games+1.0% vs expected
Jocelyn Hooper + Ann Harvey3343% games+0.4% vs expected
Kathy Barlow + Christie Cox2745% games+0.4% vs expected
Kathy Barlow + Courtney Matheny1939% games−0.3% vs expected
Alisa Cotton + Rhonda Terracciano111048% games−1.8% vs expected
Mary Jayroe + Sharon Regard3248% games−2.4% vs expected
Kyla Fulco + Laura Gooszen203047% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyla Fulco
71W–78L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Laura Gooszen
65W–111L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Stephanie Bass
22W–25L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Courtney Matheny
36W–69L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Darlene Dean
33W–50L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sharon Regard
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Michaelann Nichols
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Mary Tipton
24W–57L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Christie Cox
28W–73L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Jayroe
20W–42L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kathy Barlow
16W–50L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Lila Knicely
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Alisa Cotton
30W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Tiffany Bell
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Ann Harvey
26W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Rhonda Terracciano
71W–62L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Jocelyn Hooper
58W–55L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Melinda Hernandez
18W–29L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Katharine Knicely
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.