Teams

Marion/Kaul/18&over7.0MXD

2025 Marion Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-24vs Fort King CentonzeLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Rice / Sridhar Sagili vs Scott Anthony / Lisa Booth4-6, 1-6
2025-08-21vs Fort King LairdWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Nina Stanton vs Dillon Lagano / Chrissy Hollnagel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-10vs FK Wimbledon - BarletWon 10
W#3 DoublesSridhar Sagili / Abigail Dellovade vs Marc Broder / Beatrice Barlet6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-04vs Fort King LairdWon 10
W#2 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Daniel Clements vs Gary Greer / Chrissy Hollnagel6-0, 6-1
2025-08-03vs Fort King CentonzeWon 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Clements / Abigail Dellovade vs Weston Wise / Elise Atwell5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-30vs Fort King LairdWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Rice / Daniel Clements vs Gary Greer / Gwen Ehler6-4, 6-1
2025-07-20vs FK Wimbledon - BarletLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Long / Peter Grosshans vs Mike Tichacek / Caroline Murray2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlex Dorsey / Pamela Rice vs Beatrice Barlet / Marc Broder5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Paul Rice vs Oksana Velis / Nitin Bala6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-28vs FK Wimbledon - BarletLost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Marisa Rodriguez vs Mike Tichacek / Caroline Murray1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Abigail Dellovade
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Peter Grosshans
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Lucy Kaul
published
3.29
Daniel Clements
published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Long
published
3.13
Sridhar Sagili
published
3.01
Nina Stanton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Marisa Rodriguez
published
Bradley Vickers
published 3
Nicole DeBolt
published
Pamela Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Vuday Nandur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abigail Dellovade + Peter Grosshans213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abigail Dellovade
137W–49L career · 12 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Peter Grosshans
148W–114L career · 10 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Daniel Clements
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Sridhar Sagili
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Nina Stanton
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Marisa Rodriguez
28W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Bradley Vickers
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole DeBolt
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Rice
66W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vuday Nandur
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.