← TeamsVAC-Casebier/Clerget
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON
Scouting
No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
—
Richard Grahamusually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4
—
Steve Paceusually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-06-25Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDavid Casebier / Steve Pace vs Richard Drollinger / Terry Coe6-1, 6-2
2022-06-25Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichael Davis / Steve Pace vs Tony Humpage / Zachary Wright6-2, 6-1
2021-10-16Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJim Clerget / Steve Pace vs Karl Jensen / Robert Johnston4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Graham / Jerry Saul vs Kevin Robinson / Joseph Hartman6-0, 6-3
2021-10-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMichael Davis / Steve Pace vs Clarence Hollins / Bill Parretta6-2, 6-4
2021-09-26Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Casebier / Steve Pace vs Thomas Reber / Bill Fahey6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Graham / Jerry Saul vs Don White / Al Boling6-4, 6-3
2021-09-18Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesRichard Graham / Jerry Saul vs Joseph Hartman / Lance Lanese6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.