Teams

Berry

2026 Adult 18 & Over-SW · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-03vs BlackSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMegan Case / Carolyn Stephens vs Courtney Gianola / Susan Shemper7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKimberly McNeese vs Allison Mayers6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStaci Anding / Meredith Miller vs Melinda Robinson / Beverly Silman6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHeather Watts vs Michele Sanford4-6, 4-6
2026-05-03vs BlackWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly McNeese / Megan Case vs Allison Mayers / Beverly Silman7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Stephens / Staci Anding vs Melanie C Fink / Susan Shemper6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMeredith Miller / Stephanie Triplett vs Courtney Gianola / Melinda Robinson7-6, 6-4
2026-04-25vs BlackWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Lowery / Mary Lindsey Lumley vs Beverly Silman / Michele Sanford1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAdy Locke / Diane Hay vs Keri Galey / Logan Smithers6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaige Sullivan / Mary Miller vs Elizabeth Asmar / Melanie C Fink6-1, 6-2
2026-04-25vs BlackWon 41
L#1 DoublesTaylor Berry / Karlee Byrd vs Danielle Black / Tina Boykin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDiane Hay vs Keri Galey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Miller / Paige Sullivan vs Melanie C Fink / Elizabeth Asmar6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAdy Locke vs Logan Smithers6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Lindsey Lumley / Emily Lowery vs Beverly Silman / Michele Sanford6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Berry4014612143
2Black0441633227

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Diane Hay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.83
Carolyn Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ady Locke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.73
Megan Case
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Kimberly McNeese
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Heather Watts
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.55
Paige Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Mary Lindsey Lumley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.30
Taylor Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Staci Anding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karlee Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Watts + Carolyn Stephens224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McNeese + Taylor Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Hay
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Carolyn Stephens
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Ady Locke
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Case
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Kimberly McNeese
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Heather Watts
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Paige Sullivan
23W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Mary Lindsey Lumley
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Taylor Berry
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
Staci Anding
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Karlee Byrd
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Miller
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.