Teams

LaBonia/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Men 18 & over

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-19vs Howard/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesThomas Bateman / Doug Bateman vs Ray Howard / Calvin Price3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHenry Stratton vs Yuchen Wen0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGabe LaBonia / Samuel LaBonia vs James Bindbeutel / Richard Daniel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMike Galdieri vs Aravind Nune3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWinston Margaritis / David Patterson vs Ezekeil Hudson / Michael Newsom6-2, 6-3
2025-04-14vs Jussely/ MemphisWon 31
L#1 DoublesJames Latham / Austin Wood vs Jonathan Jussely / Suraj Sarvode Mothi3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Marszalek vs Bryan Moore6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGabe LaBonia vs Michael Hudson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWinston Margaritis / David Patterson vs Jean-Francois Lejeune / Arun Sashidharan6-2, 6-3
2025-04-12vs McKenna/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesGabe LaBonia / Samuel LaBonia vs Clark Story / Kyle Cardwell6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Marszalek vs Brent Church6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAustin Wood / Karthick Kumaran vs Price Edwards / Michael Parks3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDoug Bateman / Thomas Bateman vs Mason Ross / Jacob Monteverde6-1, 6-3
2025-04-09vs Thomas/MemphisLost 14
L#1 DoublesKarthick Kumaran / Austin Wood vs Austin Boyd / Hunter Ivy5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesGabe LaBonia vs Jeremy Huelin3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrice Bailey / Henry Stratton vs David Jones / Eric Efron3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMike Galdieri vs Michael Blen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Marszalek / James Latham vs John Lancaster / Larry Dawson6-1, 6-1
2025-03-22vs Coopwood/MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesBret Boscaccy / Court Ogilvie vs Natrez Crawford / Garrett Meggs6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJamie Marszalek vs Miles Miller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKarthick Kumaran vs Samuel Corcoran6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMike Galdieri / James Latham vs Timon Amirani / Reid Corcoran7-6, 6-4
2025-03-08vs Buchanan/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesHenry Stratton / Gabe LaBonia vs Griffin Beard / Chad Rounder4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Marszalek vs Taylor Lackie4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Patterson / Bret Boscaccy vs Richmond Poindexter / Jack Stimac0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKevin Tikhomroff vs Marq Cobb6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrice Bailey / Thomas Bateman vs John Sheahan / Michael Moore4-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Burbank/MemphisLost 13
W#1 DoublesThomas Bateman / Bret Boscaccy vs Keith Yarrow / William Warner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKarthick Kumaran vs Clayton Eber0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGabe LaBonia / Samuel LaBonia vs Berkeley Burbank / E Cavett Ostner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Galdieri / Court Ogilvie vs Mike Donoghue / Kevin Johnston6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Gabe LaBonia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Court Ogilvie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bret Boscaccy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Samuel LaBonia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Mike Galdieri
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Matt Gronostaj
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Brice Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Doug Bateman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Henry Stratton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
James Latham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Marszalek
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Karthick Kumaran
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kevin Tikhomroff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Thomas Bateman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Winston Margaritis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel LaBonia + Gabe LaBonia5258% games+24.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabe LaBonia
20W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Court Ogilvie
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Bret Boscaccy
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel LaBonia
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.22
Mike Galdieri
27W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Matt Gronostaj
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Brice Bailey
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Doug Bateman
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Henry Stratton
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Latham
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Marszalek
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karthick Kumaran
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Tikhomroff
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Bateman
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Winston Margaritis
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.