Teams

VTC-Gaylor

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Carrie Willis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Denise Dawkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2021-07-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDenise Dawkins / Kelley Gaylor vs Tao Hua / Aleli Siruno6-2, 6-1
2021-07-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzy Rylander / Denise Dawkins vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Heather Dudley6-0, 6-0
2021-07-11Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Jacqueline Wilcox vs Jennifer Andrieu / Theresa Mallari6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Agee / Denise Dawkins vs Mary Chennault / Carol Chiu7-5, 7-6
2021-06-13Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Jacqueline Wilcox vs Lynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarrie Willis vs Aracelia Hettle6-2, 6-0
2021-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzy Rylander / Denise Dawkins vs Takumi Koyama / Donna Kennish6-1, 6-1
2021-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Pamela Meiling vs Catherine Go / Linda Lovett6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Willis
121W–52L career
0%97%3%
3.85
3.5
Denise Dawkins
59W–54L career
not enough data
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.