Teams

Team 19 Springfield Smart Aces

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.14 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-06vs Team 20 MulanBloom 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShaune Cathcart / Kimberly Pedersen vs Caixia Che / Yi Su0-6, 2-6
2025-03-29vs Team 2 CCF Slicers and DicersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Sabo / Christie Palmer vs Amy Forsthoffer / Sarah Murphy6-3, 4-4
L#2 DoublesDebbie Heck / Tiffani Chen vs Susan Slinkard / Catherine McDonald2-6, 1-6
2025-02-19vs Team 17 ServivorsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCasey Keplinger / Debbie Heck vs Jolyn Green / Ellen Dague2-6, 2-6
2025-02-16vs Team 15 Love Me NotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCasey Keplinger / Kimberly Sabo vs Shawn Dalton / De Ann Boehm7-5, 2-3
2025-01-31vs Team 11 Causing a Racquet 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Rebecca Cocolis vs Asma Shah / Narayani Siva4-6, 3-6
2025-01-11vs Team 9 Strings AttachedWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiana Yoo / Kimberly Pedersen vs Lisa White / Tamara Dunlap6-4, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Casey Keplinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Anna Arnone
published 3.5
Anar Pathak
published 3
Christie Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Debbie Heck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Diana Yoo
published 3
2.68
Kimberly Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Kimberly Sabo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffani Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Keplinger
97W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Anna Arnone
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anar Pathak
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christie Palmer
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Heck
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Diana Yoo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Kimberly Pedersen
51W–76L career · 10 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Kimberly Sabo
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tiffani Chen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.