Teams

LKPowell/Westport

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 5.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-17vs LSSchneider/NMPSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDana Andrews / Stacy Beardslee vs Karen Pippin / Martine Maness6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKerri Powell / Beth Franck vs Gay Thorne / Susan Bolger4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-10-10vs LLHissom/LNTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Davin / Danielle Curwood vs Deedee Beem / Annemarie Mahoney6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Sandra Self vs Jennifer Denzler / Mary Lehman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheila Chast / Angela Childers vs Lori Hissom / Patricia Barber6-1, 6-1
2022-10-03vs LMRobinson/WestportWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheila Chast / Kathleen Stiffler vs Zahra Simonetti / JESSICA WOLTER6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Clay / Beth Franck vs Catherine Wulfhorst / Nancy Hibsch6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarrie Davin / Danielle Curwood vs Laura Gallapis / Sherilyn Dlugolenski6-1, 6-2
2022-09-26vs LSSchneider/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Beth Franck vs Amy Barnett / Sayra Brynn2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Carrie Davin vs Karen Pippin / Samantha Schneider6-3, 6-4
2022-09-19vs LLHissom/LNTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBridgett Dedmond / Sheila Chast vs Cindy Plua / Mary Lehman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrenda Clay / Beth Franck vs Patricia Barber / Jennifer Denzler6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Pam Barbagli vs Tina Krohn / Kathryn Farmer7-6, 7-5
2022-09-12vs LMRobinson/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Andrews / Stacy Beardslee vs Sherilyn Dlugolenski / Joanne Empey Rodriguez5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Sandra Self vs Catherine Wulfhorst / JESSICA WOLTER6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristen Rogers / Carrie Davin vs DIANE FIORE / Holly Reiter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-29vs LSSchneider/NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Dana Andrews vs Kelli Rester / Tina Church7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSheila Chast / Kathleen Stiffler vs Samantha Schneider / Karen Pippin1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-24vs LMRobinson/WestportSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Beth Franck vs Zahra Simonetti / Nancy Hibsch6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSheila Chast / Bridgett Dedmond vs JESSICA WOLTER / Holly Reiter2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-22vs LLHissom/LNTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Dana Andrews vs Patricia Bochey / Cindy Plua6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBridgett Dedmond / Carrie Davin vs Kathryn Farmer / Tina Krohn4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Danielle Curwood
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.50
Bridgett Dedmond
published 3.5
3.36
Kristen Rogers
published
3.35
Brenda Clay
published 3.5
3.07
Angela Childers
published 3.5
3.00
Kathleen Stiffler
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Carrie Davin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Sandra Self
published
2.80
Stacy Beardslee
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.74
Sheila Chast
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Dana Andrews
published 3
2.36
Beth Franck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.15
Kerri Powell
published 2.5
Pam Barbagli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Clay + Danielle Curwood14464% games+5.0% vs expected
Danielle Curwood + Carrie Davin6261% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Chast + Carrie Davin3452% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Beardslee + Carrie Davin1442% gamesnot enough data
Kerri Powell + Carrie Davin134 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Curwood + Kathleen Stiffler224 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Chast + Kathleen Stiffler314 matchesnot enough data
Kerri Powell + Danielle Curwood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Curwood
205W–137L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
Kristen Rogers
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Brenda Clay
40W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Angela Childers
80W–56L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Kathleen Stiffler
152W–161L career · 7 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Carrie Davin
125W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00
Sandra Self
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Stacy Beardslee
117W–144L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Sheila Chast
117W–139L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Dana Andrews
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Beth Franck
62W–77L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Kerri Powell
49W–49L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Pam Barbagli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.