Teams

UPTA18S/Sheehan/Riverside

2026 UPTA Singles 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Singles Women - 3.0

6 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 upcoming
Sep 9 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Josie SheehanEmily Proctor
Sep 16 9:00 AM
Riverside Tennis Club
Sep 23 9:00 AM
Spaulding Farm Community Tennis Courts
Sep 30 9:00 AM
Riverside Tennis Club
Oct 7 9:00 AM
Riverside Tennis Club
Oct 14 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Josie SheehanEmily Proctor
Oct 21 9:00 AM
The Pavilion
Oct 28 9:00 AM
Riverside Tennis Club
Nov 4 9:00 AM
Greenville Country Club
Flight standings5 teams · 18+ Singles Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA18S/Ruggiero/Hwy14000000
2UPTA18S/Sheehan/Riverside000000
3UPTA18S/Albers/GCC000000
4UPTA18S/Fedrowitz/Pavillion000000
5UPTA18S/Pelino/Pavilion000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Rachel Hayes
published
2.27
Kim Barrs
published
2.24
Josie Sheehan
published
2.06
Emily Proctor
published
2.02
Emily Busold
published
Meg Mcgee
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Hayes
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.53
Kim Barrs
9W–28L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Josie Sheehan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Emily Proctor
0W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Emily Busold
2W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Meg Mcgee
0W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.