Teams

A4 Sal's Berries Brown

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-20vs A5 Dominion Navolio/ SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Colleen Weisiger vs Melissa MacAleese / Leslie Baker6-2, 6-1
2023-07-30vs A6 Belmont SherdelLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Susan Gregory vs Michelle Mouer / Mary Church3-6, 4-6
2023-07-16vs A2 Avalon Urquhart AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Carla Shaffer vs Mary Spencer Blanton / Faith Kallman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Becky McNeer
published 3.5
3.40
Mandy Tornabene
published
3.33
Julie Kearfott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Colleen Weisiger
published 3.5
3.25
Donna Jamison
published 3.5
3.14
Virginia Totaro
published
3.09
3.09
Carla Shaffer
published 3.5
3.05
Andrea Hill
published 3
3.04
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
published
Elizabeth Matish
published 3
2.72
Cathy Keith
published 3
Susan Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky McNeer + Donna Jamison6160% games+11.7% vs expected
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Annmarie Strachan0537% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Piotrowski + Virginia Totaro314 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Piotrowski + Melissa Brunner-Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Donna Jamison134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky McNeer
30W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Mandy Tornabene
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Julie Kearfott
146W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Colleen Weisiger
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Donna Jamison
20W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Virginia Totaro
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Melissa Brunner-Brown
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carla Shaffer
23W–29L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Andrea Hill
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Matish
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cathy Keith
8W–24L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
Susan Gregory
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.