Teams

UPTA18C/Jackson/GCC

2022 STA Combo 18 & over-Women-UPTA · 6.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
M Christine von Wyl
published
Amanda Sanders
published 3.5
Elizabeth Hendrix
published 3.5
3.24
Tracy O'Shea
published
3.24
Elizabeth Philmon
published 3.5
3.17
Laura Whitney
published
3.15
Courtney Couchell
published 3.5
3.05
Lauren Demosthenes
published
2.99
Sherwood Cobb
published
2.90
Ann Ellison
published 3.5
2.75
Katherine Mattice
published
Erin Horsley
published 3
2.52
Rhonda Riley
published
Kathy Parke
published
Kelly Geppi
published
Lisa Baumhofer
published
Megan Holekamp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherwood Cobb + Ann Ellison1537% games−8.9% vs expected
Tracy O'Shea + M Christine von Wyl314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Philmon + Lauren Demosthenes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

M Christine von Wyl
23W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Amanda Sanders
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Hendrix
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy O'Shea
38W–27L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Philmon
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Laura Whitney
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Courtney Couchell
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lauren Demosthenes
22W–31L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Sherwood Cobb
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Ann Ellison
19W–29L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Katherine Mattice
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Horsley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Riley
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
Kathy Parke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Geppi
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Baumhofer
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Holekamp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.