Teams

Pilouras/Duffie

Northern Tier - Singles Flex League · Women Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-14vs Kapustik/PriceWon 21
L#1 SinglesChloe Cho vs Jung In Kim3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMargaret ELLIS vs Natalie Kapustik7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesYoon Hur vs Mariah Harmon6-4, 6-2
2024-09-08vs Kapustik/PriceSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGuadalupe Marti-Pena vs Gabriela Rivera1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBecky Moore vs Maggie Doby6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-01vs Kapustik/PriceSplit 11
L#2 SinglesChloe Cho vs Huijun Shen3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesYoon Hur vs Mariah Harmon6-0, 6-1
2024-08-10vs Kapustik/PriceLost 12
L#1 SinglesChloe Cho vs Jilli Jung2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesYoon Hur vs Natalie Kapustik5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAna Butler vs Huijun Shen0-6, 0-6
2024-08-01vs Kapustik/PriceSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBecky Moore vs Jilli Jung6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMargaret ELLIS vs Nora Vizzini6-4, 6-3
2024-07-27vs Kapustik/PriceWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnastasia Piliouras vs Huijun Shen6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesChloe Cho vs Mariah Harmon6-1, 6-0
2024-07-22vs Kapustik/PriceSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnastasia Piliouras vs Jung In Kim3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesAna Butler vs Mariah Harmon6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kapustik/Price52101123175
2Pilouras/Duffie25101124189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anastasia Piliouras
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Margaret ELLIS
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.98
Chloe Cho
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Becky Moore
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Peggy Duffie
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.36
Ana Butler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Guadalupe Marti-Pena
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Yoon Hur
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Duffie + Anastasia Piliouras033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anastasia Piliouras
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret ELLIS
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.02
3
Chloe Cho
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Becky Moore
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Peggy Duffie
21W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
2.5
Ana Butler
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
Guadalupe Marti-Pena
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Yoon Hur
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.