Teams

Down the Middle

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 55 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-28vs RogersLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Johnson / Mike Chatman vs Barry Dickman / Ronald Oberbillig3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMario Cristaldo / Ronald Skyles vs Geoffrey Montgomery / Scott Wallace1-6, 0-6
2024-06-07vs RogersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSimon Linder / Charles Wardell vs Scott Wallace / Jeff Buhl1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSegun Eubanks / Sean Kiley vs Jeff Dannick / Long Pham2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Queen / Mike Chatman vs Everett Diederiks / Sidney Gibson2-6, 2-6
2024-05-31vs Prime Time BallersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSimon Linder / Thomas Queen vs Samuel Hughes / Albert Hardeman1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMario Cristaldo / Ronald Skyles vs Mark Chisholm / Ivan Teelucksingh1-4
L#3 DoublesTimothy Brown / Segun Eubanks vs Gregory Whitmyer / John Matthews2-6, 2-6
2024-05-06vs RogersLost 02
L#2 DoublesMario Cristaldo / Simon Linder vs Elliot Rogers / Long Pham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSegun Eubanks / Todd Johnson vs Sidney Gibson / Jose MacAranas4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Down the Middle0401224139
2Prime Time Ballers056918136
3Rogers0718311136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Thomas Queen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Charles Wardell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mario Cristaldo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Chatman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ronald Skyles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Kiley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Segun Eubanks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Simon Linder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Timothy Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mario Cristaldo + Segun Eubanks044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Queen
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.48
3.5
Charles Wardell
0W–1L career · type M · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mario Cristaldo
26W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Chatman
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronald Skyles
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Kiley
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Segun Eubanks
6W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Simon Linder
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Brown
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.