Teams

MV-Harbell

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 24% · published 4
3.28
Jeff Marcus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Dennis Pelton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.34
Wesley Eader
usually #2 Singles 58%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Craig Mcreary
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 0
Dennis Yalch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Randy Walker
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-03-03Won 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Sullivan / Dennis Pelton vs Vladimir Fiks / Philip Stephenson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCraig Mcreary vs Ed Stoner6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlex Harbell / Wesley Eader vs Myles McGorman / Patrick Kirk6-4, 6-4
2019-02-24Split 22
L#1 DoublesJeff Marcus / Mark Trapanese vs Matt Thayer / Hoover Li6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCraig Mcreary vs Tony Mattos7-5, 7-6
W#2 SinglesWesley Eader vs Dean Waters2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDennis Yalch / Randy Walker vs Chuck Yett / Charles Hart6-3, 6-2
2019-02-23Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRich Johnson / Jeff Marcus vs Tony Humpage / Paul Kerkar6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesWesley Eader vs Marc Alexander6-1, 6-3
2019-02-17Lost 04
L#1 DoublesRichard Clark / Dennis Pelton vs John Baker / Wes Haas6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Aaron Garner2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRich Johnson / Randy Walker vs Mark Bernazzani / Rob Laing6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWesley Eader vs Bala Prashanth Reddy Chappidi6-0, 6-4
2019-02-02Won 32
W#1 DoublesJeff Marcus / Richard Clark vs Jonathan Harms / Steve Harris6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Jeff Littlejohn7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDennis Pelton / Rich Johnson vs Jim Gerber / Mark McGinnis6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCraig Mcreary vs Anthony Tursich5-1
L#3 DoublesDennis Yalch / Randy Walker vs Michael Adler / Mark Chasse6-2, 6-2
2019-01-26Lost 14
W#1 DoublesRichard Clark / Dennis Pelton vs Richard Jennings / Robin Michalisko6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCraig Mcreary vs Philip Stephenson6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Marcus / Kevin Sullivan vs Pat Nevin / David Ritchie6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Ed Stoner1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRandy Walker / Wesley Eader vs Simon Lofts / Malcolm Duncklee6-1, 6-1
2019-01-19Won 21
L#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Matt Zhou4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDennis Pelton / Rich Johnson vs Cary Gatzke / Michael Gilbertson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRandy Walker / Dennis Yalch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-01-12Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Jonathan Pulvers6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWesley Eader vs Anthony Tursich6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDennis Yalch / Randy Walker vs Steve Harris / Jeff Littlejohn6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
3.5
Jeff Marcus
34W–49L career
2%95%3%
3.28
3.5
Dennis Pelton
15W–32L career
8%87%5%
3.25
2.5
Wesley Eader
55W–103L career · type A
0%79%21%
2.34
0
Craig Mcreary
45W–43L career
not enough data
0
Dennis Yalch
14W–26L career
not enough data
0
Randy Walker
20W–27L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.