Teams

Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+

2024 Sandhills Adult 65 & over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-24vs Floyd - Fayetteville Racquet ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Sandra Florell vs Harriett Shooter / Mary Bonsall6-4, 7-6
2024-04-17vs Floyd - Fayetteville Racquet ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Cassie Drexel vs Harriett Shooter / Deborah Milburn4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSandra Florell / Cynthia Ballantyne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-10vs Floyd - Fayetteville Racquet ClubLost 02
L#2 DoublesCynthia Ballantyne / Lynn Goldhammer vs Charlotte Gallagher / Mary Bonsall1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKay Crist / Sandra Florell vs Lynn Floyd / Seema Krishna Joshi6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-03-22vs Floyd - Fayetteville Racquet ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Cynthia Ballantyne vs Karen Rogers / Mary Bonsall4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKay Crist / Lynn Goldhammer vs Harriett Shooter / Mary Carter2-6, 3-6
2024-03-20vs Floyd - Fayetteville Racquet ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Cassie Drexel vs Marion Bryan / Deborah Milburn6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEllen Harris / Sandra Florell vs Harriett Shooter / Seema Krishna Joshi1-6, 0-6
2024-03-14vs Floyd - Fayetteville Racquet ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Cassie Drexel vs Harriett Shooter / Mary Carter0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Marcy Isenhart
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Donna Hicks
published
2.78
Sandra Florell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Carol Gemson
published 3
2.66
Lynn Goldhammer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Kay Crist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Goldhammer + Marcy Isenhart0631% games−3.0% vs expected
Sandra Florell + Marcy Isenhart134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marcy Isenhart
11W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Donna Hicks
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Sandra Florell
18W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Carol Gemson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Lynn Goldhammer
20W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Cynthia Ballantyne
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kay Crist
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.