Teams

BC-Kramer/JoePiccirillo

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-12vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TonyHsuLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Landon / Peter Lozano vs Bill Willis / Daniel Keolasy2-6, 2-6
2023-05-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrett Landon / Mark Landon vs Jose Espina / Adan Flores4-6, 1-6
2023-05-13vs BC-WestEnd/DaltonCoonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Landon / Todd Ferguson vs Dave Kang / Kenny Lee7-6, 6-2
2023-05-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesNicholas Starinieri vs Shubham Waldiya3-6, 1-6
2023-04-29vs BC-PVTC/JeromeHaigLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoseph Piccirillo / Stephen Hung vs Peter Malishka / Thomas Aguilar6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-15vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Landon / Brett Landon vs Yun Kim / Roger Kodani6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2023-04-08vs BC-MCC/EricSmithLost 01
L#3 DoublesScott Kebschull / Mark Landon vs Abe Wong / Edward Han2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Wade Murphy
published 4.5
4.18
Peter Lozano
published
4.14
Brian Beach
published 4.5
4.13
Scottie Tucker
published
4.12
Stephen Hung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Jason Frame
published
3.58
Mark Landon
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Marcus Lokier
published
Matt Gilman
published
Nicholas Starinieri
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Scott Kebschull
published
Todd Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wade Murphy + Brian Beach2647% games+10.1% vs expected
Mark Landon + Stephen Hung033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Wade Murphy
42W–35L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
Peter Lozano
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Brian Beach
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.14
Scottie Tucker
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.13
Stephen Hung
38W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%20%80%
4.12
Jason Frame
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
Mark Landon
49W–56L career · 11 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Marcus Lokier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Gilman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Starinieri
61W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Kebschull
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Ferguson
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.