Teams

PBurks (Life Time)

2023 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesPamela Burks vs Candace Azad2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-26Won 10
W#3 SinglesEmily Weigel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-19vs CStaton (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Cynthia Staton6-2, 6-0
2023-07-12vs AWhalan/CCulbertson (Sardis)Split 11
L#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Christina Thigpen6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPamela Burks vs Cathy Culbertson6-0, 6-0
2023-06-28vs SSteffey (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAnna McLaughlin vs Megan Griffin1-6, 0-6
2023-06-27vs CStaton (Queens)Won 10
W#3 SinglesAnna McLaughlin vs Stephanie Stanton7-6, 6-2
2023-06-19Won 10
W#3 SinglesAnna McLaughlin vs Cathy Culbertson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Emily Weigel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.96
Christina Peterson
published 4.5
3.74
Kandi Jackson
published 4
3.53
Pamela Burks
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Anna McLaughlin
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.42
Cynthia Waldrop
published 4
3.27
April Porter
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Burks + Emily Weigel3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Weigel
162W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4.5
Christina Peterson
65W–35L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Christine Pringle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Kandi Jackson
90W–63L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Anna McLaughlin
34W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Cynthia Waldrop
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
April Porter
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.