Teams

BAY CLUB PL 40MX8.0B

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-20vs PLEASANTON 40MX8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Ryan Semmelmeyer vs Lisa Saporito / Debashis Panda7-6, 6-2
2024-07-07vs MONTE VISTA HS 40MX8.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Ryan Semmelmeyer vs Mike van Doorn / Kelly Hankins6-3, 6-4
2024-06-23vs PLEASANTON 40MX8.0BWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Ryan Semmelmeyer vs Violeta Franco / Manish Singh6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jeff Wong
published
4.01
Lionel Yang
published
3.97
Margaret Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Jaime Santos
published
3.93
Dan Gullion
published 4
3.87
Marty Gee
published
3.85
Angela Lemke
published 4
3.85
Dai Truong
published 4
3.75
Laurie Radanovich
published
3.75
Jane Wen
published
3.74
Jennifer Do
published
3.71
Zhen Zhang
published
3.38
Chad Harrison
published 3.5
3.30
Hui Xie
published
3.24
Cherub Halperin
published 3.5
Eric Wen
published
Ryan Semmelmeyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Gullion + Zhen Zhang101252% games+1.6% vs expected
Margaret Harrison + Chad Harrison1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Wong
18W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
Lionel Yang
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
Jaime Santos
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Dan Gullion
37W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Marty Gee
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Angela Lemke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Dai Truong
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Laurie Radanovich
45W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.75
Jane Wen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Jennifer Do
27W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Zhen Zhang
15W–28L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Chad Harrison
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Hui Xie
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Cherub Halperin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Eric Wen
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Semmelmeyer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.