Teams

LCTA18/Patel/DIC

2022 STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 5.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Ann Harrah
published 4.5
3.02
Lora Dennis
published
2.89
Emily Calcagno
published 3
2.84
Rosanne Barnum
published
2.70
Anne Kellerman
published 3
2.63
Cynthia Spear
published 3
2.57
2.57
Elke Pizzo
published 3
2.45
Rachel Martzloff
published
2.37
Mary Beth Elbe
published
Mary Beth Stanley
published
Tori Rhea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Spear + Rosanne Barnum4453% games+3.3% vs expected
Elke Pizzo + Heather Moldenhauer3644% games−9.2% vs expected
Elke Pizzo + Lora Dennis134 matchesnot enough data
Elke Pizzo + Tori Rhea213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Moldenhauer + Anne Kellerman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Harrah
40W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Lora Dennis
67W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Emily Calcagno
55W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Rosanne Barnum
48W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Anne Kellerman
29W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cynthia Spear
22W–17L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Heather Moldenhauer
15W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Elke Pizzo
30W–37L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Rachel Martzloff
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%64%36%
2.45
Mary Beth Elbe
37W–76L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.37
Mary Beth Stanley
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tori Rhea
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.