Teams

Curtis

Tri-Level -Spring · Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-08vs Allen CWon 21
L#1 DoublesJack Perkins / NOEL LASTIMOSO vs John Carlson / Ryan Jaramillo2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Marco Terracciano vs Allen Clendaniel / Adam Choi6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDouglas Bliss / Anthony Brooks vs Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian / Gayle Savage6-2, 6-1
2022-04-03vs JoeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJack Perkins / NOEL LASTIMOSO vs Brock Steller / Phu Ngo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Douglas Bliss vs Jay Green / Randolph Bailey3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarco Terracciano / John Kim vs Joe Buckwalter / Jeremy Conkling4-6, 4-6
2022-04-03vs Allen CLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarco Terracciano / Jack Perkins vs Allen Clendaniel / John Carlson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Stone / Douglas Bliss vs Jesse Kreger / Ryan Jaramillo3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Brooks / John Kim vs Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian / Richard Clendaniel7-5, 6-4
2022-03-25vs JoeLost 03
L#1 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Anthony Brooks vs Phu Ngo / Brock Steller3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNOEL LASTIMOSO / Marco Terracciano vs Randolph Bailey / Jay Green2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Kim / Douglas Bliss vs Chip Sweeney / Willy Stone2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Curtis Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Marco Terracciano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
NOEL LASTIMOSO
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Anthony Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Douglas Bliss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jack Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Stone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curtis Nelson + Marco Terracciano314 matchesnot enough data
NOEL LASTIMOSO + Marco Terracciano123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Curtis Nelson
72W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Marco Terracciano
67W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
NOEL LASTIMOSO
20W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Douglas Bliss
52W–43L career · type M · 4 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.79
Jack Perkins
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyle Stone
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.