Teams

OW-Blake/Baine

2022 Adult 40 & Over Women Fall Night - Mobile · 3.0 Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Arlene Volnoff
published 4
3.14
Leeanne Jones
published
2.92
Beth Mathison
published 3.5
2.87
Alice Huber
published 3
2.81
Holly Rawls
published 3
Debra Shirk
published 3
2.61
Reenie Kinney
published
2.52
Shannon Blake
published
2.52
Tena Baine
published
2.44
Maureen Lowe
published
2.44
Candace Matheny
published 3
2.25
Susan Groom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Groom + Maureen Lowe213 matchesnot enough data
Reenie Kinney + Beth Mathison033 matchesnot enough data
Tena Baine + Maureen Lowe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arlene Volnoff
94W–54L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Leeanne Jones
40W–56L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Beth Mathison
42W–29L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Alice Huber
42W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Holly Rawls
4W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Debra Shirk
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Reenie Kinney
40W–58L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Shannon Blake
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
Tena Baine
18W–48L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
Maureen Lowe
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.44
3
Candace Matheny
23W–23L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.44
Susan Groom
13W–43L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.